Showing posts with label HIT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HIT. Show all posts

Monday, January 9, 2012

Time----Time---Time

Time to click—Time to task—Time to everything

The modern tracking board has allowed the provider, the hospital consultants, administration to time multiple events in the ED.


The tracking board can be used to calculate

1.     Door-to- Provider
2.     Provider to Decision
3.     Decision to Admit
4.     Decision to Discharge.
5.     Door- to End of Event –LOS
6.     Last Lab to decision
7.     Last x-ray to decision
8.     ETC/ETC/ETC

Using Lean-Six Sigma techniques the ED efficiency can be improved dramatically. The only problem that “quality” is rarely brought into the mix. It is implied that “quality care” is fixed quotient without any variables that can be reproduced in the same time frame every time. After practicing more than 30 years, I am consistently surprised by certain events, results, and outcomes.

"Let the TRACK MEET begin”.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Guest Blogger - Jim Tate: EHR Incentives Drop Dead Dates


Several times a week I am asked the same question by providers and vendors. The question takes different twists and turns, but it all gets down to one core concern. To put it in the crassest terms, here it is. “What is the absolutely last drop dead date an eligible professional can meet the CMS EHR Incentive Program requirements and not leave any money on the table?” OK, now that the question is clear, let’s answer it once and for all.

For Eligible Professionals there are two CMS programs, Medicare and Medicaid, which incentivize EHR use. An EP must select one of the programs for participation, and is allowed to switch programs once. Let’s take a look at Medicaid first. 2016 is the “Last year to initiate participation in the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program” and 2021 is the “Last year to receive Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment.”

Jim Tate is a nationally recognized expert on the CMS EHR Incentive Program, certified technology and meaningful use and a partner in HITECH Answers. He is also author of The Incentive Roadmap® The Meaningful Use of Certified Technology: Stage 1.


HITECH Answers - www.hitechanswers.net
To purchase Jim Tate's book "The Incentive Roadmap The Meaningful use of Certified Technology: Stage 1 visit:  http://www.hitechanswers.net/products-page/

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Medication Reconciliation and E-Prescribing


E-prescribing is a certification requirement for out-patient clinics and urgent care facilities for EHRs to obtain "meaningful use" monies from the government. E-prescribing is desirable for patients, but its real objective is medication reconciliation.

This process is intended to be convenient for the patient; however, there is also an underlying goal to achieve medication reconciliation. The goal of medication reconciliation is important, but it is also time-consuming and labor intensive.

The problems associated with e-prescribing are:
  • Who is going the input the info?
  • Who is going to keep it updated?
  • What is the time frame?
  • Accuracy depends on patient and data collection

E-prescribing can only be accomplished if medication reconciliation is performed by the E-prescriber and his/her software. This puts the burden on provider and his/her staff.

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Maximize Your Personal ED Efficiency

Do you carry a heavy work load in the emergency department? Do you feel overwhelmed?  Do you find yourself asking:  What should I do first?  What should I do next?  Would this be easier with an Electronic Health Record? 

It’s important to have a battle plan to achieve maximum ED effectiveness.

The EHR has helped me achieve ED efficiency.  I’ve worked full time as an ED physician since 1978 with 150,000 clinical visits, 6-7% mid-level support and 11-12 RVU’s per hour.



My Personal Efficiency Goals are:
  • 2.3 - 2.5 patients/ hour
  • No overtime
  • No down-coding
  • Limit liability
  • Contact patient within 30 minutes of arrival
  • Discharge within 120 minutes
  • Make Admission decision within 120 minutes


To achieve these goals, I follow a theory of compartmentalization.



The Theory of Compartmentalization

1.     Approach each patient with all the data that is available from triage, old records, rescue, and patient personal profiles.  The two to three minutes you spend to do so will save a great deal of time and focus your evaluation.

2.     Walk in the room with the EKG and the old EKG

3.     Determine why the patient is there.

4.     Make a game plan with the patient, nurse, and family within time frame (avoid unsolicited visits from family members to desk)

5.     Order tests and treat patient in a parallel paradigm.  Most treatments can be completed while tests are being performed.
a.     Stable patients
                                                              i.      Give appropriate treatment, if needed
                                                            ii.      Get your extenders to perform all procedures (if available)
b.     Unstable patients
                                                              i.      Have a game plan already in place for diagnosis (reinventing the wheel takes time and inspiration)
1.     Prearranged  treatment protocols
a.     ACS/STEMI
b.     Sepsis
c.      DKA
d.     GI bleeding
e.     Hypertension - Results are parameters for nursing to adjust medications without asking or forcing the provider to “hover”
                                                            ii.      Notify your consultants early - get help



6.     Know the risk factors and red flags for standard chief complaints

                                                          iii.      Treating Hypotension - can always give O2 and fluids while trying ascertain the cause.  Assume sepsis, if normal cardiac and no blood loss (GI bleed, ectopic, AAA etc.)


7.     Analyze the Vital Signs
a.     Your  Electronic Health Record should list them and then remind you when you identified them in your History and PE
a.     Abnormal vital signs need explanation!


8.     Identify the items that will make the disposition - What is the rate-limiting step?  ASSIGN A COMPARTMENT FOR EACH PT
b.     Recheck them during the encounter and prior to disposition
a.     Need CT results
b.     Need biomarkers
c.      Who is the potential admitting provider?
d.     What consultants do I need to call and when? Now? After what test?


9.     You can usually tell in 1-3 minutes
e.     Who do I need to reassess in 10 minutes or after tests?
a.     Admit
b.     D/C
c.      10% no idea, no clue, run preliminary screening tests and then plan on re-evaluation.  You may have to start over, do not spin your wheels.  Order a sedimentation rate.


10.   Make a decision of how many active patients you can manage at given time.  Maximum is 8-10.

11.    When you reach that level, make some decisions.
                 a.     Review the x-ray and lab data 
                                                             i.      Have all the labs, x-rays, urinalysis been 
                             ordered and sent?
                                                            ii.      Your tracking board should inform you of when tests are complete, the status of blood work (4 of 6 complete), and if x-rays have been performed and are ready for evaluation.
                                                          iii.      PACs should have an icon with a preliminary reading.
                                                         iv.      Critical value notification should be on the tracking board.
              b.     Call the admitting physicians
              c.      D/C the patients.  A standardized prescription writer 
                   and discharge instructions are needed   
             d.     Reassess all other patients.
             e.     Start seeing new patients.         


12.  Should I see and new patient or make a disposition?  Always err on the side of creating space.  Your PRC scores will increase.
                                                         


In conclusion put each patient on a pathway to disposition through compartmentalization of all the various tasks.


Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Top Ten Myths about EHR's in the ED

1. Solves endless paper issues
2. Improves work flow
3. Increases provider productivity
4. Generates more income through better documentation
5. Integrates easily with other systems
6.  It's Easier to track patients
7. All Paper and printers will disappear
8. EHRs not specifically designed for the ED, can be used in the ED. They  will provide  adequate physician documentation.
9. Products with a history and track-record are better
10. Tablet-PCs are the only answer.