Thursday, September 3, 2015
Reimagining The Electronic Health Record
The blog by Ken Terry "What Will EHRs Look Like in 2020?" is quite thought provoking
It corresponds to our previous item "2020 Hindsight" as both identify the need for systematic change to make the Electronic Health Record a welcome addition to anyone’s practice.
We are writing this blog as an interactive piece, with the intent of stimulating discussion and dialogue. We will make some suggestions below; they are by no means complete. We'll then encourage others (you) to give their (your) opinions. Here are some key points that we think an EHR of the future, and the healthcare IT environment in which it lives, should address and push for:
1. A NATIONAL DATABASE: Creation of a national healthcare database with the intent of including every individual, with records presented via a standardized format.
a.Yes, this is a bit far off, and there are obstacles. However, we feel this goal is so key that planning and development now should take into account the needed sub-steps along the way, for its achievement. Otherwise, we will continue to be untangling spaghetti for eons.
b. Such a central database would streamline access to health information for every patient interacting with any Electronic Health Record in the country. While the term "interoperability" is frequently tossed around, the fundamental point of interoperability is ability to easily share information. Central storage is not really necessary, but centralized access is.
b. Direct incentive-type funding. Meaningful use was an understandable first effort. But putting huge incentives into time and work consuming data collection queries, has made providers suffer, with little benefit. When a national database is available, information can be more easily examined to determine how EHRs are being used in identifiably meaningful ways.
c. Movement in this direction would be like putting the money in the bank. As it became established, it would be a fundamental and available resource.
2. STANDARDIZATION OF CPOE: Creation of a standardized national Computerized Order Entry (CPOE) system with its user interface replicated at every care-site care would generate huge improvements in safety and efficiency. Modifiable order sets for key presentations could be built and maintained by specialty/sub- specialty authorities, and adjusted to meet local needs.
a. This would represent a significant advance, allowing providers of all stripes to interact with local systems when directing care, without endless learning curves.
b. Optimally, the entire staff should be able to use the system rather than the highest paid providers being the data input clerks. Various levels of authority would allow hierarchical verification and acknowledgement of orders, promote safety, discussion of clinical course, and appropriate supervision of ordering.
c. One would expect that developed orders would be care-setting specific (modular) and provide the most common orders in easy array of choices.
d. Order interaction with the pharmacy should also be care-setting specific i.e Emergency Department, operating room etc. Moreover, prescriptions/e-prescribing should be care-setting, care-track, and provider specific.
e. Simplification could be globally anticipated. For example calculators (such as pediatric dosing, and other weight/age based therapies) could be straight-forward and easy to use (see the local ATM)
3. INTELLIGENT CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT: It is time for research to progress in the realm of clinical decision support. Artificial Intelligence is making its way into the world (think Siri), and medicine should not be behind in this exploration.
a. A real potential benefit of an EHR in clinical care is in the promise of AI. Right now, most of the research needed on any one case is still on our shoulders. Who of us does not do a google search or explore a reliable source (like "Up-to-Date") on a frequent basis to support of clinical decisions. The butler (Siri's colleague) can help do that for us.
b. A good system ought to be aware of your needs, even before you are conscious of them. Should not a differential diagnosis be automatically generated from the information within your CC, HPI? If the computer recognizes certain symptom complexes, the provider is supplied can be given easy access to information, treatment protocols, policy recommendations, and appropriate reminders to consider key diagnostic options.
c. Also included should be medication alerts that indicate potential severity of pharmaceutical choice and dose.
4. SIMPLIFICATION: in the design, construction, and implementation of the actual EHR. For example:
a. Make nursing notes, provider notes, labs, x-ray reports, etc. accessible without having to go to multiple screens to find them. This is technology available now. Tabs, mouse-overs, and other tools should be fully implemented in the EHR space. (Google News is a good example of a summary presentation that includes all potentially important items)
b. Artificial intelligence/decision support suggestions should appear in a way that supports the provider’s ability to look over and collate all the data.
c. Another example exists in the sometimes disparate modules that comprise an enterprise EHR. Direct interaction between the EHR and the tracking board is essential to assist providers and caregivers in controlling a flood of information and prioritizing decision making. Why put information in twice, three times, or more?
These are just a few suggestions. Please add your own below. Let's help make the record a real-time clinical assistant instead of just a medical-legal document and a billing tool for reimbursement.